Moisture as a Critical Determinant of Feed Hygiene and Safety

Implications for Microbial Control and Livestock Health

Mrs. Yamini Sripal, Dr. Sushant Mhatre, Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharyya 

The hygiene and safety of animal feed are of paramount importance in the broader context of animal health, productivity, and food safety. Feed often serves as a reservoir and transmission vector for a variety of microorganisms, many of which originate or proliferate during storage. Environmental fluctuations—such as irregular precipitation, extended droughts, and shifts in temperature and humidity—compromise the integrity of feed drying and storage processes. These external conditions, combined with intrinsic feed characteristics (e.g., pH, oxygen levels, nutrient profile, and moisture content), form a complex ecosystem that can foster microbial contamination.

Among these variables, moisture stands out as a critical factor. While a certain baseline moisture is necessary for processing and animal consumption, elevated levels directly influence microbial growth and toxin production, ultimately affecting the health and performance of livestock.

Moisture and Microbial Dynamics in Feed 

Microbial activity in feed is directly influenced by moisture content, particularly by the amount of free water available, measured as water activity (aṵ). Water activity above 0.70 can support the growth of spoilage organisms, while most molds and bacteria thrive at levels above 0.80 [EFSA, 2010]. High moisture levels increase the likelihood of microbial proliferation, especially in warm and humid climates where proper drying and storage are challenging.

To ensure quality, yield, and profitability, feed manufacturers monitor moisture levels throughout all stages of processing, including raw materials, mash, and pellets. Managing moisture is a persistent challenge due to variable climatic conditions, inconsistencies in raw material quality, and technical limitations. The standard method for assessing water content is through measuring moisture content, typically expressed as a percentage of the feed’s total weight. However, a more accurate indicator of microbial risk is water activity (aṵ), which represents the amount of free water available to support microbial and biochemical activity. Microbial growth is minimal below specific water activity thresholds, but as water activity (aṵ) rises, the risk of microbial contamination increases substantially (Roos, 2003). Lower water activity (aṵ) correlates with enhanced feed stability and reduced microbial growth potential.

Microbial Growth and water activity Dependence

Various microorganisms such as bacteria, yeasts, and molds thrive under specific water activity and temperature conditions. 

Water Activity (aṵ)	Microorganism type
0.91	Gram-negative  Bacteria
0.88	Yeast (Practical Limit)
0.86	Gram-positive Bacteria
0.80	Mycotoxins production
0.70	Molds (Practical Limits)
0.60	Absolute limits (all Organisms)

Maintaining water activity below 0.70 is, therefore, essential for minimizing microbial growth during storage and distribution phases [EFSA, 2010; FAO, 1999].

Factors Influencing Moisture-Driven Spoilage

Several factors interact synergistically to drive microbial proliferation in feed:

• Temperature and Humidity: Elevated temperatures cause water migration within feed particles; humidity contributes to condensation, both increasing free water availability.
  
  
  
• pH and Oxygen Levels: These support or suppress microbial metabolism depending on the organism type.
  
  
  
• Storage Conditions: Inadequate ventilation, poor insulation, and improper packaging can exacerbate moisture retention.

The result is an environment ripe for microbial activity, leading to the degradation of nutrients, physical spoilage, and toxic metabolite production.

Key Microorganisms and Associated Hazards

Molds
 Species such as Aspergillus flavus and Penicillium spp. flourish in high-moisture environments, producing dangerous mycotoxins including aflatoxins and ochratoxins. These compounds have been associated with immunosuppression, hepatotoxicity, reproductive failure, and poor growth performance [Whitlow & Hagler, 2005].

Bacteria
 Pathogens such as Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli may colonize improperly stored feed, particularly when moisture exceeds critical thresholds, increasing the risk of enteric diseases in livestock [Jones & Hagler, 2000].

Yeasts
 Yeasts ferment residual sugars in moist feed, contributing to off-odors, clumping, spoilage, and loss of nutritional value.

Consequences of Excess Moisture in Feed

Consequence	Description
Spoilage and Nutrient Loss	Degradation of amino acids, lipids, and vitamins by microbial enzymes.
Mycotoxin Contamination	Production of aflatoxins, fumonisins, and zearalenone in moldy feed.
Livestock Health Risks	Immunosuppression, organ damage, reproductive disorders.
Reduced Performance	Decreased feed conversion ratios and weight gain in livestock.
Economic Losses	Higher veterinary costs, reduced productivity, feed recalls, and waste.

Safe Moisture Thresholds for Various Feed Types

Feed Type	Recommended Moisture Content
Cereal Grains	≤ 13–14%
Pelleted/Compound Feeds	≤ 12%
Silage and Fermented	Controlled via fermentation

These limits are designed to restrict microbial proliferation while preserving palatability and digestibility.

Strategies for Moisture and Water Activity Control

To maintain hygienic conditions and inhibit microbial growth, the following measures are recommended:

Drying Procedures: Utilize appropriate post-harvest and in-process drying techniques.
Monitoring Protocols: Implement regular testing for both moisture content and aₐ at all stages—raw materials, intermediates, and finished products.
Optimized Storage: Ensure feed is stored in clean, dry, temperature-regulated environments.

Preservatives: Employ antifungal agents, mold inhibitors, or organic acids to extend shelf-life.
Moisture-Resistant Packaging: Prevent external moisture ingress during handling and transport.
GMP Compliance: Regular sanitation and equipment maintenance to minimize cross-contamination.

Conclusion

Moisture is not merely a processing variable—it is a central determinant of feed safety, microbial stability, and economic viability. Elevated moisture and water activity levels promote microbial proliferation and mycotoxin synthesis, compromising feed quality and animal health. Understanding and managing moisture dynamics—particularly through the lens of water activity—offers a powerful tool for reducing microbial risks. Through targeted drying, vigilant monitoring, and stringent storage controls, stakeholders can safeguard feed hygiene, optimize animal productivity, and protect public health.

Reference:

1. D’Mello, J. P. F. (2000). Handbook of Animal Feed Contamination and Safety. CRC Press.
2. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM). (2010). “Scientific Opinion on the Risk for Animal and Human Health Related to the Presence of Deoxynivalenol in Food and Feed.” EFSA Journal, 8(3), 1870.
3. Effects on poultry and livestock of feed contamination with bacteria and fungi – K.G. Maciorowski et al – Animal Feed Science and Technology Volume 133, Issues 1–2, 1 February 2007, Pages 109-136 – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.006
4. FAO. (1999). Manual on the Application of the HACCP System in Mycotoxin Prevention and Control. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
5. https://agriculture.institute/food-microbiology-cpo/water-activity-microbial-growth-food-preservation
6. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/01275-X – Y.H. Roos
7. Jones, F. T., & Hagler, W. M. (2000). “Mycotoxins and Animal Agriculture.” Poultry Science, 79(6), 1078–1085.
8. Microbial pathogen contamination of animal feed – Elena G. Olson et al – https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819470-6.00023-8
9. Roos, Y. H. (2003). Water Activity and Physical Stability in Foods. In Barbosa-Cánovas, G. V. et al. (Eds.), Water Activity in Foods: Fundamentals and Applications. Blackwell Publishing.
10. The science behind managing moisture, water activity –  September 2020 issue of Pet Food Processing
11. Whitlow, L. W., & Hagler, W. M. (2005). “Mycotoxins in Dairy Cattle: Occurrence, Toxicity, Prevention and Treatment.” North Carolina State University Extension Bulletin.